Put another blog on the fire!

Entries from November 2007

Can you break a bill for me?

November 29, 2007 · No Comments

Americana
A Million Dollar Bill


Can you open a bank account with this?

Well, he’ll never go down in the annals of criminal genius. A man was arrested in South Carolina this week after he tried to open a bank account with the fake $1,000,000 bill shown above. The teller (surely laughed and) called the police.

Surprisingly, this happened last month, too. A man was arrested in Pittsburgh after he tried to pay for his groceries with a fake $1,000,000 bill. Reports say he became irate when the cashier wouldn’t make change.

Friends, there never has been a real $1,000,000 bill in the United States. Since 1969, when the Treasury discontinued its $500, $1,000, and $10,000 bills, the most cash you can stash with a single slip is $100. But counterfeiters, you will soon see, are an enterprising and creative lot. At least the ones that try to pass off real denominations are.

Extra! Extra!
General Musharraf Resigns Resigns as Pakistan’s army chief, that is. As of Wednesday, General Musharraf is no longer General Musharraf. But he is still President Musharraf. No one can say just yet what that means for Pakistan. But we can . . .

Take a peek at Pakistan’s history

search icon Search our site
feed icon Get our feed
join icon Join now
friend icon Give a gift
envelope icon Manage email

Counterfeit History

As early as the 1690s, paper money was circulating in the American colonies. Within about 50 years, every colony was printing money. And so were the counterfeiters.

Some colonies hired Ben Franklin to make their money, impressed by the printer’s skill at putting details in bills that made them harder to copy. But really, in those early years, paper money was easy to fake–so easy that housewives could support families by forging five-pound notes.

Mother of Invention

That’s what Rhode Island’s Mary Peck Butterworth did. She simply laid a piece of starched muslin over a genuine bill printed in 1715 and ironed it lightly. When she pulled the muslin away, it carried a negative impression of the bill. She then placed the muslin on a piece of paper and ironed it again, transferring the pattern to the paper. After freshening up the image with a quill pen, Mrs. Butterworth had money.

Before long, she was employing most of her family and a couple of hired hands in her lucrative craft. She made so many fake bills that Rhode Island had to recall that whole issue of five-pound notes. She got caught, but because she always burned her muslin cloths, the state had no hard evidence–and Mrs. Butterworth beat the rap.

Worse, Mrs. Butterworth was just the syrup on the pancake. In 1775, when the Continental Congress began to print paper money to pay for the Revolution, rampant counterfeiting helped undermine the currency’s value. People soon referred to any worthless thing as being “not worth a Continental.”

In Banks We Trust

After the Revolution, the Constitution, and the adoption of the dollar as the currency of the United States, it must have seemed like everyone was printing money–and, surprisingly, a lot of it was legitimate. Before the 1860s, about 1,600 private banks were authorized to print “state bank notes,” and each bank had distinctive designs for its currency.

As many as 7,000 designs tempted counterfeiters–until 1861, when the federal government started printing green-tinted “greenbacks” to finance the Civil War. By 1863, Congress had moved to replace the myriad notes issued by private state banks with more uniform “national bank notes” issued by more regulated “national” banks.

And by 1865, amid alarm over the fact that at least a third of the paper money circulating in the United States was bogus, the government established the Secret Service to target counterfeiters. (It wasn’t until 1902 that the Secret Service officially took the job of protecting the president.) The Secret Service cracked down hard on funny money. They might have gone overboard in 1881, when they destroyed the printing plates used to make play money for board games.

Fed Up

Today, every paper dollar in America is a “federal reserve note” printed by the U.S. Treasury’s Bureau of Engraving and Printing and issued only by the Federal Reserve Bank. And the Secret Service continues to track down money cheats.

But counterfeiters have mostly moved offshore, using today’s computer technology–and in some cases, the resources of rogue governments–to iron out bills like old Mrs. Butterworth. The lure of easy money never fades.

Categories: Now that's Funny!

Down Under Overview

November 28, 2007 · No Comments

World Tour
Down Under Overview


A glimpse at Australia
Get a better look

Friends, Australians went to the polls on Saturday and pummeled Prime Minister John Howard and his conservative coalition government. The prime ministry, and control of Australia’s parliament, will now pass to Kevin Rudd and his Labor Party, who want to ratify the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, put a computer on every secondary-schooler’s desk, and redeploy some of Australia’s troops in Iraq.

Extra! Extra!
Paris Burning Riots rocked the Paris suburbs again this week, following the deaths of two immigrant teens in a car crash with police. You may remember similar riots in 2005. But those weren’t the first dark days for the City of Light.Take our petit
tour of Paris
search icon Search our site
feed icon Get our feed
join icon Join now
friend icon Give a gift
envelope icon Manage email

“Ruddslide”

The election, dubbed a “Ruddslide” by the Australian media, marks a major shift in Australian politics. Prime Minister Howard has held the office since 1996–a longer run than any other Australian prime minister except one. Now he may become just the second sitting prime minister in Australian history to lose a race for his own seat in parliament (several media outlets have already called the race against him, but the results aren’t official yet).

While Australians prepare for a governing change, let’s take a quick trip to the continental country and size it up by the numbers. To our readers in Australia: sorry if these numbers seem obvious to you. But remember, most KnowledgeNews readers–and writers–live 10,000 miles (16,000 km) away. Hey, at least we’re not still calling your homeland terra australis incognita (”unknown land of the south”)–which, after all, is where the name “Australia” came from.

Down Under, By the Numbers

2,967,910 – Australia’s total area, in square miles (7,686,850 sq km). That makes it just a bit smaller than the 48 contiguous United States. It also makes Australia the world’s sixth largest country–geographically speaking–after Russia, Canada, China, the United States, and Brazil.

35 – Percentage of Australia that is so dry it is “effectively desert,” according to the Australian government. Another 35 percent of the continent gets less than 20 inches (50 cm) of rain per year and is classified as arid or semi-arid. That’s one reason most Australians live near the nation’s 16,000 miles (25,760 km) of coastline–and especially along the southeastern coast, where the climate is temperate.

21 million – Australia’s total population. That’s about one-third as many people as live in the United Kingdom, which covers an area about one-thirtieth the size. Nearly as many people live in the state of New York.

4 million – Population of the Sydney metropolitan area, Australia’s largest. Sydney is the state capital of New South Wales and the site of Australia’s first European colony, established by Britain’s Arthur Phillip in 1788. Australia’s second-largest city is Melbourne. Its national capital is Canberra, a city built for that purpose as a compromise between Sydney and Melbourne. Construction of Canberra began in 1913–12 years after the six British colonies Down Under first became the “Commonwealth of Australia.”

40,000 – Minimum number of years that Australia’s aboriginal inhabitants have called the place home. The original aboriginals must have somehow traveled more than 50 miles over open sea all those years ago. Today, nearly 500,000 Australians identify themselves as “indigenous.” Some consider “aborigine” a slur–and some don’t like “aboriginal” much better.

–Steve Sampson

Categories: Economics · Government · Headlines · News · Politics · Uncategorized